Review Results: Accepted pending lien resolution. Certified. Liens ===== o There is a table file in the document/directory listing all the data files. It looks like an index file. It should probably be in the index/ directory, but some reviewers prefer it in the data or document directory. Please move it to the index/directory, but mention in the docinfo.txt file that it exists. o In the dataset.cat file, the summary table needs to have dates and day-of-years checked. o If possible, add the QE curve for the CCDs to the other documentation or calibration information, as seems most appropriate. o In the document/ directory, the epoxy_sis.pdf file Table 1 lists some dates as 2010 which should be 2011. (What is the status of this in the documentation set?) Why are these critical documents that were supposedly collected in the best version in the document set being duplicated in the data set document/ subdirectories? They should not be. o In the data set document/ directories, epoxy_inflight_cal_summary.pdf file, there is a reference to "iCar" which, to start with, should be "i Car", and which needs to have the better-known HD number included each time that name is listed. This file should not be in the data set document/ directories (it should be in the document collection). o In the quaternion description document, the terminology used to identify the elements (q0, q1, q2,q3) doesn't match the terminology used in the FITS headers, which refer to "qA, qX, qY, qZ". o The dataset.cat file repeats a table that's in the epoxi.cat file, but the two tables do not agree. This level of mission information that is not dataset-specific should not be included in the dataset description field to begin with. o The dataset.cat file, "HRII Lunar South Pole Radiometry" paragraph includes a sentence stating that "the flat field data are very good", but this paragraph does not appear to be about flat fields. This sentence doesn't t belong here; remove it. o In catalog/dataset.cat: Data Set Overview, Instrument Checkout, first line: "On 4 October the three science instruments..." Add year, presumably 2007. o in catalog/dataset.cat: Data Set Overview, 2nd paragraph, line 9, DOCUMENT diretory => DOCUMENT directory. o In catalog/dataset.cat: Calibrations summary chart, Cruise 2, line for HRII Rad Cal #1 (Beta Hyi), repeately => repeatedly o catalog/dataset.cat - Data: Timing for Spectra: 14 - 15 lines down in paragraph - "assuming the spacecraft is in its usual orientation with the solar pointing roughly toward the sun" is missing a word, presumably "panels". o dif-cal-hrii-2-epoxi-calibrations-v2.0/hrii_2_epoxi_calibrations.lbl - In the column description for INSTRUMENT_MODE_ID, recommend adding a note explaining HRII DIAG mode's reset and read frames. o Very minor, so not really a lien, but we should keep the text but remove the yellow highlighting in the HRIIR limitations section of the supporting document file: hartley2_cal_pipeline_summ.pdf. This file is in many of the data sets. The highlighted text was there when LFeaga wrote it to get agreement from the team that those were the correct values. We do not need or want to make that stand out in the archive, so the highlighting should be removed. o catalog/hrii.cat - Fix outdated wording (e.g., "after EPOCh..."). o catalog/epoxi.cat - Check frequency that is specified for the IR coma scans for the paragraph about departure imaging E+12 to E+21 days. o All copies of /catalog/epoxi.cat Cruise 1, EPOCh Photometry Test: "On 4-9 November 2007, EPOCh photometry tests were performed. During these tests, the HRIV instrument observed a bright (V=9) visual binary star (HD 80607) for 12 continuous hours to check..." However the images were unexpectedly offset by 29 microradian (12.2 arcsec)." Check this conversion. I get 29 microradian = 6.0 arcsec. Which value is correct?? o document/pdsdd_epoxi.ful document/pdsdd_epoxi.idx - Add "DEEP IMPACT/EPOXI DOCUMENT COLLECTION V3.0" VOLUME_SET_NAME in pdsdd_epoxi.ful. Then remake pdsdd_epoxi.idx. o epoxi_sis.pdf - Page 27, table, last row, col 2: "...-MRIV-..." should be "...-MRI..."? - Section 4.5: the massive table does not have EPOXI:MAXIMUM, EPOXI:MINIMUM, EPOXI:MEDIAN, EPOXI:STANDARD_DEVIATION, which are in examples earlier in the SIS and in labels such as dif-c-mri-3_4-epoxi-hartley2-v1.0/data/radrev/2010/248/mv10090513_4000000_001_rr.lbl