DIF-CAL-HRII/HRIV/MRI-6-EPOXI-TEMPS-V3.0

Review Result: Certified.
 
Symbol Key:
  o = Lien open
  x = Lien resolved or closed
  + = Comments (by SMcLaughlin unless otherwise indicated)   

Catalogs
========
x In dataset.cat, the paragraph immediately preceding the 'Data' subheading 
  appears to be mangled (mismatched parenthesis, not grammatically correct 
  first sentence).  This is covered by comments submitted offline, prior to 
  review.
+ Done.

DATA/
=====
x Richard Chen notes: None [of the data labels] have MISSION_PHASE_NAME, 
  SPACECRAFT_CLOCK_START_COUNT, or _STOP_COUNT. No objection if that makes 
  sense and was deliberate.  
+ Not including these keywords was intentional.

x raw/mri/mri_raw_t_temps_2010.lbl:
  typo: sRECORD_BYTES = 157
+ Done
    The 'Pictorial Atlas of Deep Impact and EPOXI Instrument Thermal
    Telemetry', included in this dataset, illustrates the locations of 
    the thermal telemetry points (sensors).  The thermal design of the
    instruments is described by Hampton, et al. (2005) [HAMPTONETAL2005]. 
    The Deep Impact instrument calibration paper by Klaasen, et al. (2008)
    [KLAASENETAL2006] and the EPOXI instrument calibration paper by
    Klaasen, et al. (2013) [KLAASENETAL2011] describe how various
    temperatures affect the calibration of the HRII, HRIV, and MRI
    instruments.  

+ Per Mike A'Hearn's request, EPOXI team added two short documents: one
  describes the influences of IR temperature measurement to the calibratio
  pipeline and another describes the two domains of coefficients (AMMOS
  vs pipeline) used to convert thermal data to physical temperatures.