=============================================================================== EPOXI, Jul 2013, SAM: Resolved liens for the "DIF" EPOCh Earth and Mars V2.0 datasets that were peer reviewed by SBN on 05 Mar 2013. My comments regarding the resolution of each lien start with the string ">> SAM:". EPOXI, Mar 2013, SAM: Resolved the following liens the following "DIF" Hartley2 datasets that were peer reviewed by SBN on 05 Mar 2013. My comments regarding the resolution of each lien start with the string ">> SAM:". =============================================================================== PDS/SBN Comet Data Review Typos/Corrections from Matthew Knight March 3, 2013 ========================================================================= dif-c-mri-5-epoxi-hartley2-photom-v1.0/ catalog/dif.cat -Clock correlation section: The texts states that as of early 2009 there was a plan to have clock corrections. Are these available yet? If so, the text should be updated. >> SAM: No, the clock corrections will most likely be done in 2013. Brian C. and Tony F. are still on the hook for this task. However, I did add this expected completion date to the clock correlation discussion in dif.cat and dii.cat. catalog/epoxi.cat -Mission timeline: the following were listed under DIXI/Hartley 2: but I didn't see them in the body of the document: "HRII Spectrometer Cooldown", "Flyby and Closest Approach". >> SAM: Done. -The last paragraph under "Recommended Reading > EPOXI" is slightly different in different copies of epoxi.cat in different datasets. This seems to be the only difference. >> SAM: Made sure latest version of epoxi.cat is copied to this dataset. -Under "Mission Data", should those datasets already archived by PDS have the full PDS reference given? >> SAM: No. The PDS search engine allows a user to find all datasets belonging to the EPOXI mission, and the EPOXI mission page at the SBN website lists all datasets. No need to put references in epoxi.cat. -Under "Mission objectives": should the tenses here be past? >> SAM: Done. catalog/mri.cat -"Instrument Overview", "The filter wheel..." paragraph: Consider giving a reference for the Hale-Bopp filter sets (e.g. Farnham et al., 2000) >> SAM: Done. And added FARNHAMETAL2000 to ref_epoxi.cat catalog/ref.cat -Under "EPOXI General": both BODEWITSETAL2013 and KLAASENETAL2011 say they have been submitted to Icarus. Do they have references? I cannot find the Bodewits one on ADS, and the most promising one for Klaasen is titled "Stardust-NExT NAVCAM calibration and performance" (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Icar..222..436K) with a different author list. If so, shouldn't it be KLAASENETAL2013? [NOTE: this appears in multiple datsets so please crosscheck] >> SAM: The IDs BODEWITSETAL2013 and KLAASENETAL2011 are referenced in other catalog files for the EPOXI archive, such as dataset.cat. These papers have been submitted but are not yet published. Therefore I did not change the publication dates. However the IDs BODEWITSETAL2013 and KLAASENETAL2011 have already been used in datasets archived in the PDS, so we should continue to use them. -Under "DIXI Journal Publications", I think LIVENGOODETAL2009 should be LIVENGOODETAL2011 for the paper "Properties of an Earth-Like Planet Orbiting a Sun-Like Star: Earth Observed by the EPOXI Mission" (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AsBio..11..907L) [NOTE: this appears in multiple datsets so please crosscheck] >> SAM: Yes, Tim did get that paper published in Astrobiology in 2011! I updated LIVENGOODETAL2009 to reflect that new information. However LIVENGOODETAL2009 has already been used in datasets archived in the PDS, so we should continue to it. document/hartley2-photometry_report.pdf -It would be useful if this document had page numbers -p.2, line 2: "Klaasen, et012" -> "Klaasen, et al., 2012" -p.2, line 16: Belton et al. 2012 should be 2011 -p.5, line 1: "process in" -> "process is" -p.6, line 1: "result images" -> "resulting images" -p.8, line 1: "method use" -> "method we used" -p.8, line 5: "output save" -> pick one of these two >> SAM: Above 7 items done. -p.10: Do Bodewits et al. 2013 and Klaasen et al. 2012 have full references yet? >> SAM: Klaasen et al. 2012 was accepted for publication in 2013; changed pub date to 2013. Bodewits et al. 2013 is expected to be published later in 2013. document/hartley2_mri_anomaly.pdf -p.6, paragraph 2, line 5: "up by the" -> "up by" >> SAM: DONE. ------------- dif-m-hriv-3_4-epoxi-mars-v2.0/ catalog/dataset.cat -line 144: "Klaasen, et al. (2008)" -> "Klaasen, et al. (2006)" [occurs in all epoxi-earth and epoxi-mars dataset.cat files; also occurs on line 529 of dif-e-hriv-3_4-epoxi-earth-v2.0/catalog/dataset.cat] >> SAM: Done. The DI Calibration paper was supposed to be published in 2006, so the PDS ref key ID was submitted that year, KLAASENETAL2006. However publication was delayed until 2008. However, we updated the pub date 2012 to 2013 for the EPOXI Calibration paper, in the text. -line 309: "image when is" -> "image when it is" [occurs in all epoxi-earth and epoxi-mars dataset.cat files] >> SAM: Done. -line 316: "orientation FITS" -> "orientation of FITS" [occurs in all epoxi-earth and epoxi-mars dataset.cat files] >> SAM: Done. -Per SAM: In dataset.cat, a reference object for new CROWETAL2011. >> SAM: Done. catalog/hriv.cat -line 39: "reflected" -> "reflects" [also in dif-e-hriv-3_4-epoxi-earth-v2.0/] >> SAM: Done. catalog/ref.cat -see KLAASENETAL2011 comment in dif-c-mri-5-epoxi-hartley2-photom-v1.0 section [Goes for all epoxi-mars and epoxi-earth datasets] >> SAM: The ID KLAASENETAL2011 referenced in other catalog files for the EPOXI archive, such as dataset.cat. These papers have been submitted but are not yet published. Therefore I did not change the publication dates. However the ID BODEWITSETAL2013 has already been used in datasets archived in the PDS, so we should continue to use them. -Should Crow et al. 2011 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...729..130C) be referenced somewhere? [Goes for all epoxi-mars and epoxi-earth datasets] >> SAM: Done. Added CROWETAL2011 to ref_epoxi.cat. catalog/dataset.cat >> SAM: Check/revise text pointing to "see the relative boresight alignments section of the Deep Impact instrument calibration document." But Matthew said he found it in instruments_hampton.pdf, which is NOT the same document. I should change DI Inst Cal Doc to EPOXI Inst Cal Doc because it has the latest alignment graphic for DIXI! >> SAM: No, the published EPOXI Calibration Papaer has the latest, best relative boresight alignments in section 5.1. The Earth dataset.cats already point to this publication. Fixed the Mars datasets, which had outdated text about the alignments. >> SAM: Matthew had problems finding filter info. Enhance text about what's in image parameter tables! He extracted filter # from FITS headers. :( >> SAM: Done. ------------- dif-m-mri-3_4-epoxi-mars-v2.0/ All comments discussed previously >> SAM: Done. ------------- dif-e-hriv-3_4-epoxi-earth-v2.0/ All comments discussed previously >> SAM: Done. ------------- dif-e-mri-3_4-epoxi-earth-v2.0/ All comments discussed previously >> SAM: Done. The end.