EPOXI Review - 29 September 2010 DIF-X-HRIV-5-EPOXI-EXOPLANETS-PHOT-V1.0 ======================================= o To the dataset.cat file section "Related Data Sets", add a line to refer users to the PDS home page to find these data sets, and include the base URL. >> Done. o Query whether it is possible to republish the Rich Barry paper as part of the data set, and include it if so. >> Done. R.Barry provided a report of his PSF work. See epoxi_hriv_psfs.pdf in DOCUMENT. o Add uncertainties to the measurements. >> Done. D.Deming summarized photom errors for each target. See epoch_trans_obs.pdf in DOCUMENT. o Need a summary of the calibration steps applied, and differences in calibration from target to target. Suggested: a table listing target vs. processing steps applied. >> Done. D.Deming summarized the steps applied to each target. See epoch_trans_obs.pdf in DOCUMENT. o Document which PSF was used for which light curve. >> Done. D.Deming stated each target star was used to make its own PSF. See epoch_trans_obs.pdf in DOCUMENT. o Richard Chen will submit a list of standards compliance issues via email: catalog/epoxi.cat o Target MOA-2009-BLG-266 needs a TARGET.CAT. >> At the review, SBN showed a catalog file for this target is included in the DIF-X-HRIV-5-EPOXI-EXOPLANETS-PHOT-V1.0 data set. The file needs to be submitted to EN. catalog/dataset.cat o DATA_SET_DESC has [KLASSENETAL2006] but file has no REFERENCE_KEY_ID = KLASSENETAL2006. >> During review, it was noted that [KLASSENETAL2006] is a typo. Should be [KLAASENETAL2006]. >> Done. o S. McLaughlin submitted a list of liens: catalog/dif.cat o Change instances of Doc Set "V2.0" to "V3.0". >> Done. catalog/epoxi.cat o Change start/stop dates to "2009-09-30" for "Checkout after HRI Turnoff" on 2010 DOY 273 in the mission activities list. >> Done. General Liens ------------- o Check all EPOXI data sets for the FITS header errors listed in Kelly Fast's presentation; fix them as needed. >> N/A. o Note that no link was provided from the review page or dataset.html pages to the DI/EPOXI documentation set, so this was effectively unavailable to the reviewers. >> N/A. These data are rejected for certification pending the additions listed above.