Listed below are the liens/RIDs that were found at the PDS/PSA February 2016 review of the Prelanding thru Escort 1 phases of the Rosetta mission. Even though this particular data set may have not participated in the review, it uses the same pipeline and so the liens likely apply here as well. Please take note that some issues may be resolved, while others are not. If any other issues are discovered please let the PDS-SBN know. It is expected that a fully lien resolved version will be produced during post mission ops and archived with an incremented data set version number. 1)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-108-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 Location: Files: ".LBL in / DATA Title: More context needed for DATA_QUALITY_DESC and not consistent. Some Level 2 data that should have been processed for a Level 3 product based on its time tag shows "BAD" quality for tag: DATA_QUALITY_DESC. Description: "There are 288 Data Records from the sub-systems: GDS, GDSIS, and IS, where DATA_QUALITY_DESC=""BAD"". RO-GIA-IAPSUPA-IF-012, Table 3.6 defines DATA_QUALITY_DESC=""BAD"" when a large amount of ""spurious SCI data is present in the TAB"". What does SCI represent in this context? Are these records unuseable or useable data? " Proposed solution by Reviewer: More information on DATA_QUALITY_DESC could be written in DATASET.CAT Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: To be clarified if possible and More details will be added in future deliveries. 2)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-115-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 RO_GIA_IAPSUPA_IF_012_I1.ASC and RO_GIA_IAPSUPA_IF_012_I1.PDF Location: DOCUMENT Title: Calibration Equation needed Description: The calibration equation: Physical Quantity = a + b (ADC) + c (ADC)^2 .... Terms which give the physical values. Proposed solution by Reviewer: Please add it Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Have to check. It can be added to the documentation. 3)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-117-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 / RO_GIA_IAPSUPA_RP_118_1.PDF Location: DOCUMENT Title: No instrument schematic described. Description: EAICD document missing the instrument schematic figure. The page says: "Extract from GIADA User Manual with more detailed instrument description" There is no instrument schematic in the datasets. Proposed solution by Reviewer: Please include Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: The instrument scheme will be added to the EIACD 4)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-118-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 / Location: All Title: Pointing and geometry information only available via SPICE Description: Published and presented GIADA results cannot be confirmed from the datasets without SPICE. Proposed solution by Reviewer: Can pointing and geometry information be found some other way? Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: SPICE can be read with C library which does not require licenses. Not changes necessary according to the team 5)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-104-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 Location: DOCUMENT Title: Include the referred data reduction published papers. Description: "This is a complex instrument. The only diagram schematic for the instrument is found here and should be included. The data reduction is found more completely here too. ""COLANGELIETAL2007"" ""BUSSOLETTIETAL1999"" ""ESPOSITOETAL2002"" ""MAZZOTTAEPIFETAL2002"" ""PALOMBAETAL2001"" "" PALOMBAETAL2002""" Proposed solution by Reviewer: Please include these documents. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: We did insert already the papers but limited to those which are open access 6)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-110-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1 Location: EXTRAS Title: Extraneous files Description: "There are many files titled: PDSLOG_[].txt that give processing information: and nothing else. " Proposed solution by Reviewer: Remove them? Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: We will remove these files in the next deliveries 7)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-113-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1. and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 Location: DATA Title: No DATAINFO.TXT Description: There is no top view listing of the data files in this directory Proposed solution by Reviewer: Please add it. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: The list of the files is in the index as requested in the PDS standard. 8)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-101-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 Location: AAREADME.TXT, line 12 Title: Incorrect title in AAREADME Description: Line 12 has incorrect title. Proposed solution by Reviewer: Should be corrected to read: Rosetta GIADA data during Comet Escort 1 Phase. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: We will correct it 9)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-102-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 Location: AAREADME.TXT, Line 20 Title: Confusing extraneous line Description: "The Scientific phase started on 7th May 2014." refers to previous phase Proposed solution by Reviewer: Should be deleted Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: We will correct it 10)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-103-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0/ Location: CATALOG/DATASET.CAT, line 28 Title: Typo Description: "Physica" Proposed solution by Reviewer: should be Physical Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: We will correct it 11)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-116-AG Dataset: RO-C-GIA-3-PRL-PRELANDING-V1.0 and RO-C-GIA-3-ESC1-COMET-ESCORT-1-V1.0 RO_GIA_IAPSUPA_IF_012_I1.ASC and RO_GIA_IAPSUPA_IF_012_I1.PDF Location: DOCUMENT Title: Section is Misnamed Description: 2.3.7 "Software" Should be "Data Processing" This is an important distinction! Proposed solution by Reviewer: - Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: This will not be modified because it is a standard PDS 12)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-GIADA-001-SA Dataset: - Location: - Title: - Description: trivial editorial issue of mis-naming “PHYS_DATA” as “PHYS” in the ICD. Proposed solution by Reviewer: Not sure if it is necessary to modify it Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Up to the team if it needs modification 13)Reference ID (RID): ro-c-gia-101-RE Dataset: ro-c-gia-3-esc1-comet-escort-1-v1.0 Location: document/ro_gia_iapsupa_if_012_i1.pdf Title: GIA PDF Description: " - p.32: ""each GIADA subsystem (GDS, IS, GDS_IS, MBS e MBS_HEAT),"" 1. The actual directory data/gdsis does not have the underscore 2. What is ""e""? perhaps should be a comma - p.39: sections 3.1.2 (Data Set ID Formation) and 3.4.2 (Data Set Naming) may be duplicate, delete or merge… - p.39: ""DATA_SET_NAME = ROSETTA-ORBITER-CAL-GIADA-2-GRND-FS-V1.1" " catalog/dataset.cat has only 1 hyphen: DATA_SET_NAME = ""ROSETTA-ORBITER 67P GIADA 3 ESC1 COMET ESCORT 1 V1.0"" this must be fixed to be consistent between pdf and .cat - p.45: For DATA_QUALITY_ID, the values seem to be 1 or 3, not -1,0,1,... Suggest pointing to section 3.3.1 where 1 and 3 are defined. - p.49: Suggest listing for each Data Product the columns of data in the actual table along with their meanings and parameters. all other instruments include tables here… it’s just a consistency issue. - p.49: ""4.3.11 Data Product 'MB HEAT'"". Is this the same as MBS HEAT? Suggest converging on one of those two." Proposed solution by Reviewer: correct document Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: RID by Engineering node at PDS. Not discussed at Scientific review meeting 14)Reference ID (RID): ro-c-gia-103-RE Dataset: ro-c-gia-3-esc1-comet-escort-1-v1.0 Location: calib/…/*.lbl, data/…/*.lbl Title: new value "EMEJ2000" Description: For keyword COORDINATE_SYSTEM_ID, can provider use "J2000" instead? Proposed solution by Reviewer: COORDINATE_SYSTEM_ID = "J2000" instead of "EMEJ2000" Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: RID by Engineering node at PDS. Not discussed at Scientific review meeting