Listed below are the liens/RIDs that were found at the PDS/PSA February 2016 review of the Prelanding thru Escort 1 phases of the Rosetta mission. Even though this particular data set may have not participated in the review, it uses the same pipeline and so the liens likely apply here as well. Please take note that some issues may be resolved, while others are not. If any other issues are discovered please let the PDS-SBN know. It is expected that a fully lien resolved version will be produced during post mission ops and archived with an incremented data set version number. 1)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-100-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: RO-SGS-PR-1014 (1/0) p14 §5,1 Title: No relevant data avail for the review Description: The Rosetta Science Archive Comet data Review procedure explains that we should have "data from the Prelanding phase and the first 3 months of the Comet Escort phase" and we only get DOY 89 and 103 of 2014 !!! These days have no interest for scientific investigations because it's cruise data phase : far from the comet ... These two small samples are clearly not sufficient for the review. Moreover there is no ranging data. The very first objectif of the review which is "completeness and scientific integrity of the Rosetta data sets" is totally not reached. Proposed solution by reviewer: RSI review not reached, schedule a new review Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: A delta review will be organised when a more representative science sample is available.Agreed 2)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-101-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: - Title: Long-term scientific usability Description: ESA, CNES, DLR, NASA and many others space agency agreed to use a common standard for the tracking message : the TDM standard. The blue book of this standard was published on 2007 November. It would be necessary for perenity of these data to deliver it in this standard. Proposed solution by reviewer: Give data in this internationnal standard Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 3)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-102-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: RO-RSI-IGM-DS-3127 (3/3) Title: Reference consistency and annex Description: § 1.2 : Referenced file naming convention document is the old one of MEX from 2003, there is a new one for Rosetta (ROS-RSI-IGM-3037 from 2010) given in the review. §6 The annexe is empty, it should be deleted. Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 4)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-103-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: RO-RSI-IGM-MA-3181 (4/draft) Title: Absence of acronym definition, and few remarks Description: "- §3.2.1 p 32 the acronym RFDU which probably mean 'Radio Frequence Digital Unit' is not defined. - In § 1.5 p 12. §3.3.2.1 Malargue ground station is not present … Wasn't it used for Rosetta mission ? - There are many ""TBD"" or ""TBC"" which should not be in the document at this level of mission. - In § 5.1.1.1 EDF is not defined ... It seems it's ""Event Definition File"" ?" Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 5)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-104-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: RO-EST-IF-5010 (1/c) Title: Out of review scope Description: - Proposed solution by reviewer: Recommend that the document is removed from the delivery Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 6)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-105-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3118 (5/0) Title: Absence of documents Decsription: In Appendix C and D p 62 and 64, documents CGIM_ANNEX_C.pdf and CGIM_ANNEX_D.pdf are mentionned but not given in the data pakage. Proposed solution by reviewer: Include the documents Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 7)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-106-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3119 (1/10) Title: Tipo mistake and acronyms definition Description:"- §1.1 p12 ""… ground stations New Norcia …"" - §2 p15 RTLT not defined : Round Trip Light Time - §2.3 p 17 Mars Express is referenced, Rosetta is not … The frequencies are probably same, it should be precised. Same comment §3.1 p 20 where Rosetta is not specified. - § 3.3 p 22 OWLT not defined : One Way Light Time - § 3.4 p 23 ""transponder delay time"" -> ""transponder time delay"" - Annex A p41, Annex B p43 ans Annex C p45 : These annex are empty" Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 8)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-107-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-ICM-DS-3119 (1/10) and ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3121 (2/3) and ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3126 (1/0) Title: Unconsistency of data Description: In §2.3 from DS-3119 and § 2.1.2 from DS-3126, 1 AU have no digit after coma unlike DS-3121 Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 9)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-108-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3121 (2/3) Title: "TBD" should not appear " Description: - The ROETTA reference of the document is not precised : neither at the first page, nor at the header of each pages - In §2.3 Asteroid in the table is not difined. But Lutetia and Stein could be described … - §3.1.1 p 17 : The Argentine station MALARGUE is not given in the table." Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 10)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-109-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-IGM-DS-3127 (3/3) Title: Internal document reference and annex Description: "- §5.3.3 There is an error in the reference at the line ODF-SPEC-5373 - ANNEX A p 33 is empty" Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 11)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-110-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: RO-EST-TN-3372 (9/0) Title: SWT agreement not fulfilled Description: "§3.2 p 12 : ""For the Orbiter instruments, a SWT agreement states that delivery from wake-up to LTP4 (20/11/2014) will be done in one data set."" We get 2 sets for single days." Proposed solution by reviewer: "Same as RIDS : RO-AR-RID-INST-100-INI" Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Team will investigate the possibility of combining multiple observations into a single data set. Agreed 12)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-111-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ROS-RSI-IGM-IS-3079 (5/28) Title: Unconsistency between document and data Description: "- in § 5.1.2.1.1 p52 : There are more documents in the data pakage than in the table : DOCUMENT/RSI_DOC. ROS_OPS_LOGBOOK_05.PDF ROS_OPS_LOGBOOK_06.PDF ROS_OPS_LOGBOOK_07.PDF ROS_OPS_LOGBOOK_08.PDF ROS_OPS_LOGBOOK_14.PDF ROS_RSI_IGM_DS_3127.PDF - Table have more document than data pakage in DOCUMENT/DSN_DOC. Even if some are optional like R00DSN0L1A_SOE....TXT some other are not optional like LIT_SIS.HTM - EXTRAS/ANCILLARY/RSI directory is not described in the document but is present in the data pakage. - Tipo error p 28. The § 6.2.3.9 have no title and is empty. - p28 mission phase acronym are defined after CR6 as PRL, ESC1, ESC2, ESC3 and ESC4 see RO-EST-TN-3372" Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 13)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-112-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: ERRATA.TXT Title: No sample for UPLINK_FREQ_CORRECT Description: If problem on doppler data occur a folder UPLINK_FREQ_CORRECT will be generated in the CALIB directory containing information to correct it, but the sample given in data package do not contain error. This correction of error could not be reviewed. Proposed solution by reviewer: Give data containing this doppler error. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 14)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-113-INI Dataset: RORSI_0012_2014_089_V1.0 and RORSI_0013_2014_103_V1.0 Location: M32UNBWL1B_RCL_030801_00.PDF Title: German Description: Document in german … incompréhensible pour moi. Proposed solution by reviewer: Translate in english Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agreed 15)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-014-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: All Title: Minimal data Description: If the review is to cover data collected from Hibernation through the beginning of Escort, then two observations from late March and early April 2014 is not representative. Only one instrument mode through one ground station with no science content is represented. Proposed solution by reviewer: Provide additional data Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: A delta review will be organised when a more representative science sample is available.As per proposed solution 16)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-015-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: All Title: Outdated documentation Description: With very few exceptions, the documentation has not been updated since about 2006. Proposed solution by reviewer: Review and update documentation. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.agree need to update 17)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-016-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: 2014 ops log, RSI Activity column Title: 2014 ops log/COM Description: All but one of nearly 500 entries is listed as "COM". There were other activities. Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct the ops log Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.agree need to update 18)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-017-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: 2014 ops log, RSI Activity Column Title: Missing BSR Description: Six bistatic radar experiments were conucted in 2014; they are missing from the ops log Proposed solution by reviewer: Add the BSR entries Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.need to update ops log 19)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-018-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: DATASET.CAT Title: Activity descriptions Description: There is no information on the objectives of any COM observation. Proposed solution by reviewer: Add details for each COM activity to its respective DATASET.CAT file. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agree 20)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-019-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: R32ICL1L1B_AG1_140891743.LBL Title: Incorrect record and byte counds Description: MANY labels give wrong record and byte counts for associated data files Proposed solution by reviewer: Check and correct all labels. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agree 21)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-020-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: DOCINFO.TXT Title: Incorrect DOCUMENT listings Description: Remove irrelevant documents, add missing documents, ensure that lists of dcuments elsewhere (e.g., AAREADME.TXT) are consistent. Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct as described Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agree documents need updating 22)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-021-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: documentation Title: Spurious references to MEX, VEX, and Stanford Description: Software and documentation has been written to cover MEX and VEX as well as RSI. In some places MEX and VEX references appear where only RSI is appropriate. Stanford is mentioned several times as being involved in processing and archiving (DATASET.CAT); Simpson is incorrectly listed as an RSI contact at the end of AAREADME.TXT. Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct as described Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: As per proposed solution by reviewer.Agree documents need updating 23)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-INST-022-RAS Dataset: RO-X-RSI* Location: DATASET.CAT Title: HGA Patterns Description: DATASET.CAT mentions availability of HGA patterns from the DSN. They are not included, but they should be (source ESA). HGA patterns are not needed for the two data sets under review here; but they are critical to bistatic radar observatios later. Proposed solution by reviewer: Correct as described Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Needed for future datasets.Agree 24)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-102-RE Dataset: ro-x-rsi-1_2_3-prl-1186-v1.0 Location: calib/.../dcl/r32icl1l1b_c1x_141021637_00.lbl (and other *l1b*.lbl) Title: Incorrect BYTE counts Description: "RECORD_BYTES = 140 should be 141 - ROW_BYTES = 140 should be 141" Proposed solution by reviewer: replace with correct count Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: - 25)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-103-RE Dataset: ro-x-rsi-1_2_3-prl-1186-v1.0 Location: data/level1a/.../*.lbl, calib/.../*l1a*.lbl Title: Suggestion Description: Instead of FILE objects with RECORD_TYPE = UNDEFINED (which PDS tools can't use), can these have TABLE objects describe the .raw data? Proposed solution by reviewer: Consider Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: - 26)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-104-RE Dataset: ro-x-rsi-1_2_3-prl-1186-v1.0 Location: data/level1b/.../dp1/r32icl1l1b_d1x_141032133_01.lbl (perhaps .../dp*/*.lbl?) Title: Incorrect BYTE counts Description: """RECORD_BYTES = 140 should be 141 - ROW_BYTES = 140 should be 141""" Proposed solution by reviewer: replace with correct count Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: - 27)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-105-RE Dataset: ro-x-rsi-1_2_3-prl-1186-v1.0 Location: document/ros_rsi_igm_is_3079.pdf Title: ros_rsi_igm_is_3079 PDF Description: "p.81: RVM2 should be PRL? dataset.cat's timestamp matches, and DATA_SET_ID uses ""PRL"" instead of ""RVM2"" - p.83: add ""PRELANDING"" (used in DATA_SET_ID) to cell with mission phases " Proposed solution by reviewer: see description Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: - 28)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-106-RE Dataset: ro-x-rsi-1_2_3-prl-1186-v1.0 Location: index/index.lbl Title: Wrong VOLUME_ID Description: VOLUME_ID = MEXMRS_0101 should be RORSI_0013 Proposed solution by reviewer: Replace with correct ID Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: - 29)Reference ID (RID): ro-x-rsi-100-PSA Dataset: All Location: DATA Title: DVAL-NGT funadamental errors on all data Description: Significant errors are thrown by DVAL-NGT. PVV verify fails and there are many ODL and Dictionary errors that preclude a full validation. Need to investigate this before a full list can be made and sent to the team, as the errors are far more serious than seen with previous DVAL versions. Proposed solution by reviewer: - Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: -