A check on the Flat field of the Stardust NAVCAM images Jian-Yang Li The flatfield of Stardust images was checked through a simple analysis using the images of the Moon obtained during its Earth flyby included in the cruise data archive (STARDUST-C/E/L-NC-2-EDR-V1.0). Three non-saturated pairs of images taken through Oxygen, C2, and red filters (centered at 633.6 nm, 513.2 nm, and 712.9 nm, respective) were used in the analysis. In each pair, the first image that was taken earlier is not compressed, and the second is compressed by a square-root lookup table as provided by Stardust team in the calibration document. In these images, the Moon is resolved into more than 500 pixels in diameter. For each pair, two images were shifted and rescaled to align with each other. The relative shift of the position of the Moon in the field of view changes by about 160 pixel in horizontal direction, and from 38 to 85 pixels in vertical direction, in the raw image frame. The change of scale of the Moon is only about 0.5% from one image to another, and no relative rotation is found. The alignment is better than 0.1 pixel. Slight rotation of the Moon can be recognized from the two frames taken about 4 minutes apart, but the shift of features is much less than one pixel. Finally the ratio of the two images in each pair was calculated to check the flatfield. The result ratio images are shown in moon_ratio_oxygen.gif, moon_ratio_c2.gif, and moon_ratio_red.gif. For all three ratio images, there is no variations greater than 3% found. The variation in the ratio disk of the Moon is comparable to background noise. The small-scale features in the disk of the Moon that are only several pixels in size are associated with the imperfect alignment between two frames due to the rotation of the Moon. This indicates that any non-linear flatfield variation across the center 500 to 700-pixel region in the CCD is smaller than 3%. Further, the average ratios from all three filters are all unity, suggesting that any linear flatfield variation over the distance of the relative shift of the Moon in the two frames of each pair is less than 3%. Considering the effect of compression/decompression noise included in one of the two images in each pair, the ratio images suggests that the flatfield of Stardust images is beter than 2%.