SDNC_0001 ========= errata.txt - Any chance of getting some of these notations into the DATA_SET catalog object CONFIDENCE_LEVEL_NOTE? - Is there a list of the unapproved keywords? It should be included here if possible. - Items #2 and 9 both mention the same image. The problems look like they are related. These items should be conbined into a single one. - Typos: line 48: "images" in "images labels" should be singular line 55: "an will" should be "and will" voldesc.cat - Where did that VOLUME_SERIES_NAME come from? CATALOG/ -------- catinfo.txt - This file says: "More information about contacting the PDS Central Node is available in the AAREADME.TXT file". This is not true. dataset.cat - Syntax errors: line 1389: "END" is misspelled - Missing DATA_SET_TERSE_DESC and ARCHIVE_STATUS - Headings in the DATA_SET_DESC text do not follow the minimum requirements. Specifically, the "Data Set Overview" topic, which should be first, is missing. (Actually, it's there but in the wrong format.) - The extensive DATA_SET_DESC text is not attributed. - There is so much information in here I wonder if it shouldn't be a (or several) separate document(s), so that it can be cataloged directly. - Sample labels do not belong in a DATA_SET_DESC. - Keyword definitions from the PDSDD do not belong in a data set description. - Too much irrelevant text - not read. - There is information in both the DATA_SET_DESC text and the "errata.txt" file that should be in the CONFIDENCE_LEVEL_NOTE text. inst.cat - Headings do not follow standards. - There is a table of contents, which implies this was prepared for publication elsewhere, but I see no attribution. Who wrote this and who owns the copyright? - Documentation this extensive should be in a separate file. - I see a Table 2 and a Table 4, but no Table 3, although one is listed in the contents. - There is a Table 7, but only 6 tables listed in the contents - Typos (spotted while browsing): line 66: "who's" should at least be "whose". ("Whose" is not appropriate for inanimate and intangible objects.) line 303,5,6: The character "(" has been inserted rather than some other symbol - but I'm not sure what. This recurs throughout the text. line 411: "it's" should be "its" - Clearly this text has not bee proofed or technically edited. It should be. I did not have time to do this. - There is at least one instance of references to "Stardust Mission documents" in the extensive text, but there are no references listed in the INSTRUMENT_REFERENCE_INFO object, where they should be cited. insthost.cat - There is not attribution for the extensive text in the INSTRUMENT_HOST_DESC. - Typos: line 22: "earth" should not be capitalized line 62: "Interstellar Dust Particles" should not be capitalized. All over: The name "Wild-2" should not be hyphenated. ... too much text. No time to read it all. Looks like it needs proofing, though. mission.cat - There are multiple MISSION_TARGET objects - only one is allowed (it may be multi-valued). - The target name "Wild-2" should never be hyphenated. (It's also not in SBN-standard format for comets.) - The second "sentence" of the MISSION_OBJECTIVES_SUMMARY is not a sentence. - MISSION_DESC has a table of contents, imlying it was prepared for publication elswhere. Who wrote it and who owns the copyright? - "Wild-2" is systematically misspelled (it should not be hypenated) throughout the text. - Too much text in the MISSION_DESC - did not have time to read it. I did spot the occasional typo while browsing, indicating this has not been proofed. It should be before ingest. - The MISSION_DESC should probably be a separate document. - The text of the MISSION_DESC makes reference to at least one Stardust mission document by reference number, but there are no references cited in the MISSION_REFERENCE_INFORMATION object. This should be corrected. Any and all references cited in the text should be listed in the MISSION_REFERENCE_INFORMATION list. person.cat - All telephone numbers should be in quotes. DATA/ ===== *.img - There are numerous syntax errors in the image labels, all involving "1E+32", which should be "1.E+32". - PRODUCER_INSTITUTION_NAME should not be abbreviated ("JPL/ACT") DOCUMENT/ ========= docinfo.txt - The text indicates there are "several" documents in the directory, but then goes on to list only two. - The "images/" subdirectory is unexplained in this text, as is the "onlabels.txt" file. lblinfo.txt - What is the point of this file? If it stays, it should contain the similar information which is currently languishing in the DATA_SET_DESC text (where it certainly does not belong). onlabels.txt - This duplicates the problematic label information in the DATA_SET_DESC text. It should be combined with the preceeding file. - No time to proof or edit. DOCUMENT/CALRPT/ ================ calrpt.lbl - The TEXT object at the bottom of this label is used incorrectly. Text files in this directory require DOCUMENT labels, either individually or collectively. - In fact, all these TEXT objects should be DOCUMENT objects. - There is a syntax error in this labels - a mis-matched END_OBJECT label. - "PDF" is not a valid standard value for DOCUMENT_FORMAT. This should be "ADOBE PDF" - The tables presented as CSV text here should probably be formatted as TABLEs and included in a CALIB directory. - Is there no ASCII version of the text part of the calrpt.pdf document? - Is there copyright information for the calrpt.pdf file? Looks like it was published somewhere. DOCUMENT/IMAGES/ ================ There are no labels in this directory. DOCUMENT/SCDESC/ ================ scdesc.lbl - Who owns the copyright on the aerogel brochure? Do we have permission to republish? Do we have permission to use the photos in this context? - When I look at this I see at least one photo laying over text, making it unreadable. - The HTML files reference non-local image files which are not in this directory and are not mentioned in the label. - Who owns the copyright on the web document? INDEX/ ====== index.lbl - There are syntax errors in this label (missing quote on line 62) - Is this an approved use of a TEXT object?!? - The number of ROWS and ROW_BYTES in the index.tab file does not agree with the values given in this label file. - There are numerous column description errors throughout this label. For example: Column 2 (START_TIME) is 23 bytes wide, not 14. Column 3 (SPACECRAFT_CLoCK_START_COUNT) is 14 bytes wide, not 23. Column 7 (FILTER_NAME) is defined as a 6-byte character field, but in the file it is a 5-byte integer (does NOT have character delimiters around it) ...stopped checking here. Could not verify. Is this even the right label for this table? The size of index.csv is NOT equal to the sum of the sizes of index.tab and index.hdr. Why not? (index.lbl and indxinfo.txt say this is just a concatenation of those two files for convenience.) SOFTWARE/ ========= softinfo.txt - The abbreviation "XVT" is used but never defined. In fact, its mention sems to be a no-sequitor. What is it? - No version number is given for NASAview in the text. Three different version numbers are given in the directory tree listing - why? - Why is there no Linux directory? - There is no mention of Windows XP and 2000. Aren't these supported? SOFTWARE/MACPPC/ ================ nv1r12b.lbl - The SOFTWARE object is mission SOFTWARE_INFORMATION, SOFTWARE_ONLINE and SOFTWARE_PURPOSE subobjects. - There are both missing and invalid keywords in this label. - There are numerous additional syntactic and semantic errors in this label. It is not even close to being compliant or even self-consistent. No further attempt to verify. SOFTWARE/PCWIN32/ ================= nv2r52.lbl - Same sort of rampant errors as for MACPPC/. No attempt to verify. SOFTWARE/SUNSOLAR/ ================== nv2r53a.lbl - Same sort of rampant errors as for MACPPC/. No attempt to verify.